Mughal Emperor’s Demonisation by British and BJP

Aurangzeb Alamgir, the sixth Mughal Emperor (r. 1658–1707), is often remembered for his controversial policies, which have overshadowed his remarkable achievements in administration and economics.

His reign was marked by a highly efficient and inclusive administrative structure, as well as significant economic reforms that sustained the Mughal Empire during a period of immense challenges. However, his legacy has been heavily politicized, first during the British Raj and later in contemporary India under BJP rule.

In this article, we explore Aurangzeb’s administrative and economic prowess, the inclusivity of his governance, and the political factors behind his demonization.

Aurangzeb’s Administrative Mastery

Aurangzeb’s administrative skills were unparalleled, and his reign is often considered the zenith of Mughal bureaucratic efficiency. He inherited a vast empire and expanded it to its greatest territorial extent, stretching from Kashmir in the north to the Deccan in the south. His administrative reforms included:

1. Centralized Governance:
   Aurangzeb maintained a tightly centralized administration, ensuring that all decisions flowed through him. He was known for his meticulous attention to detail, personally reviewing state affairs and issuing detailed farmans (royal decrees). His hands-on approach helped maintain control over a sprawling empire.
2. Inclusive Administrative Structure:
   Contrary to the popular narrative of religious intolerance, Aurangzeb’s administration was remarkably inclusive. He appointed Hindus to key positions, such as Raja Jai Singh and Jaswant Singh, who served as generals and governors. His finance minister, Raghunath Rao, was also a Hindu. This inclusivity was a pragmatic approach to governance, ensuring loyalty and efficiency across diverse regions.
3. Judicial Reforms:
   Aurangzeb was deeply committed to justice and often intervened in legal matters to ensure fairness. He compiled the Fake-e-downloada comprehensive code of Islamic law, which standardized legal proceedings and provided a framework for governance. His courts were accessible to all subjects, regardless of religion.
4. Military and Logistical Efficiency:
   Aurangzeb’s military campaigns, particularly in the Deccan, were marked by strategic planning and logistical brilliance. He maintained a disciplined and well-organized army, which was crucial for defending and expanding the empire.

Economic Reforms and Stability

Aurangzeb’s economic policies were instrumental in sustaining the Mughal Empire during a period of prolonged military campaigns and internal challenges. His reforms included:

1. Land Revenue System:
   Aurangzeb implemented significant reforms in the land revenue system, ensuring a steady flow of income to the state. He introduced measures to curb corruption among revenue officials and sought to protect peasants from excessive taxation.
2. Trade and Commerce:
   Under Aurangzeb, trade and commerce flourished. He maintained a stable currency system, minting high-quality coins that facilitated economic transactions. His policies supported both domestic and international trade, with the Mughal Empire remaining a major economic power.
3. Fiscal Measures:
   The reimposition of the jizya (a tax on non-Muslims) in 1679 is often cited as evidence of religious intolerance. However, historians argue that this was primarily a fiscal measure to address the empire’s financial strain during the costly Deccan wars. The tax was not uniformly enforced and exempted certain groups, such as the poor and religious scholars.

The Inclusivity of Aurangzeb’s Governance

Aurangzeb’s administration was far more inclusive than he is often given credit for. His policies were driven by pragmatism rather than religious fanaticism. For example:

• Hindu Participation:
  As mentioned earlier, Aurangzeb appointed Hindus to high-ranking positions, recognizing their administrative and military expertise. This inclusivity was essential for maintaining stability in a diverse empire.
• Temple Patronage:
  While Aurangzeb is often criticized for destroying temples, he also issued grants for the maintenance of several Hindu temples. For instance, he provided land grants to the Balaji Temple in Chitrakoot and the Umananda Temple in Assam. These actions suggest a more nuanced approach to religious policy.
• Cultural Patronage:
  Aurangzeb was a patron of art and culture, commissioning works in Persian and Sanskrit. His reign saw the translation of Hindu texts into Persian, reflecting a commitment to cultural exchange.

Political Demonization: British Raj and BJP Rule

Aurangzeb’s demonization has been shaped by political agendas, both during the British Raj and in contemporary India under BJP rule.

1. During the British Raj:
   British colonial historians portrayed Aurangzeb as a tyrannical and fanatical ruler to justify their own rule as a “civilizing mission.” By emphasizing his religious policies, they sought to create a divide between Hindus and Muslims, fostering a narrative of Muslim oppression. This divisive historiography was later adopted by Indian nationalist and communalist historians.
2. Under BJP Rule:
   In contemporary India, Aurangzeb has become a symbol of Muslim tyranny in the discourse of Hindu nationalism. The BJP and affiliated organizations often invoke his reign to stoke communal sentiments and promote a narrative of Hindu victimhood. This politicization has led to the selective portrayal of Aurangzeb as a religious bigot, ignoring his administrative and economic achievements.

Aurangzeb’s reign was a complex interplay of administrative brilliance, economic reforms, and controversial religious policies. His inclusive governance and pragmatic approach to administration have been overshadowed by his demonization, which has been fueled by political agendas during the British Raj and in contemporary India. By examining Aurangzeb’s legacy in its entirety, we gain a more nuanced understanding of one of history’s most debated rulers. His achievements in administration and economics remain a testament to his capabilities as a ruler, even as his religious policies continue to spark debate.