Skip links
Justice Jamal Mandukhel replied to Justice Mansoor Ali Shah's letter

Justice Jamal Mandukhel replied to Justice Mansoor Ali Shah’s letter

Justice Jamal Mandukhel replied to Justice Mansoor Ali Shah’s letter.

Justice Jamal Mandukhel while replying to the letter of Justice Mansoor Ali Shah has said that he spoke in the context of the 26th constitutional amendment. Will not answer on the 26th Amendment as the petitions are pending in the Supreme Court, you know the Judicial Commission has been reconstituted after the 26th Amendment. Your suggested recommendations have already been incorporated into the draft.

Responding to Justice Mansoor Ali Shah, Justice Jamal Mandukhel said that he had already shared your letter with you personally, had already considered your suggestions and will also look into the suggestions in tomorrow’s letter. You can also give your suggestions to the Rules Committee in the future.

Justice Jamal Mandukhel added that most of your suggestions have been incorporated in the Judicial Commission Rules, the mandate of the Rules Committee is only to draft the rules for the appointment of judges, it is learned that you have suggested the names of judges for 3 High Courts. , I suggest that the names for the judges should be given after the approval of the Commission by the Rules.

The reply letter said, “I welcome your suggestions regarding the appointment of judges. The constitutional mandate is that the judiciary be independent, impartial, and the judges of the judiciary competent and honest. The Rules Committee is committed to devising the best procedures to achieve these objectives.” , your proposal will be considered at the December 16 meeting of the Rules Committee, any suggestions are awaited before the draft Rules are prepared.



This website uses cookies to improve your web experience.
Explore
Drag